theparisreview: “My aversion to describing amorous details in my work is probably that I treasure physical love so highly I don’t want to let strangers in on it. For, after all, when we describe copulation we’re describing our own experiences. I like privacy. I think that other writers should do what they can do, and if they can spend—as one of my American girl students did—ten pages on the act of fellatio without embarrassing themselves, very good luck to them. But I think there’s more artistic pleasure to be gained from the ingenious circumvention of a taboo than from what is called total permissiveness. When I wrote my first Enderby novel, I had to make my hero say ‘For cough,’ since ‘Fuck off’ was not then acceptable. With the second book the climate had changed, and Enderby was at liberty to say ‘Fuck off.’ I wasn’t happy. It was too easy. He still said ‘For cough,’ while others responded with ‘Fuck off.’ A compromise. Literature, however, thrives on taboos, just as all art thrives on technical difficulties.” Anthony Burgess, The Art of Fiction No. 48

theparisreview:

“My aversion to describing amorous details in my work is probably that I treasure physical love so highly I don’t want to let strangers in on it. For, after all, when we describe copulation we’re describing our own experiences. I like privacy. I think that other writers should do what they can do, and if they can spend—as one of my American girl students did—ten pages on the act of fellatio without embarrassing themselves, very good luck to them. But I think there’s more artistic pleasure to be gained from the ingenious circumvention of a taboo than from what is called total permissiveness. When I wrote my first Enderby novel, I had to make my hero say ‘For cough,’ since ‘Fuck off’ was not then acceptable. With the second book the climate had changed, and Enderby was at liberty to say ‘Fuck off.’ I wasn’t happy. It was too easy. He still said ‘For cough,’ while others responded with ‘Fuck off.’ A compromise. Literature, however, thrives on taboos, just as all art thrives on technical difficulties.”

Anthony Burgess, The Art of Fiction No. 48

  1. callmewaltergripp reblogged this from theparisreview
  2. shadowpirate reblogged this from booklover
  3. catherwell reblogged this from theparisreview
  4. dodginglances reblogged this from theparisreview
  5. theministryiscoming reblogged this from yeahwriters
  6. christinalphabet reblogged this from yeahwriters
  7. ranunculused reblogged this from theparisreview
  8. melvillemifunemtumekonigsberg reblogged this from theparisreview
  9. writebetweenworlds reblogged this from yeahwriters and added:
    And his use of suggestion is more effective and erotic than many a writer’s expanded sexual details.
  10. cabritumashachikitu reblogged this from booklover
  11. londonxbridge reblogged this from theparisreview and added:
    My aversion to describing amorous details in my work is probably that I treasure physical love so highly I don’t want to...
  12. the-3-rings-book-blog reblogged this from theparisreview
  13. justlookatyou reblogged this from theparisreview
  14. sherlock-marple reblogged this from booklover
  15. mylissah reblogged this from booklover
  16. sweet-n-savory reblogged this from theparisreview
  17. bavariansugarcookie reblogged this from yeahwriters